E-ISSN
Template
Quick Menu
SubmissionsFocus & Scope Editorial Team Author Guidelines Peer Review Process Publication Ethics Publication Frequency Plagiarism Screening Indexing Author Fees Open Access Policy
Contact Editor-in-Chief
Tools
Publication Ethics
PUBLISHING ETHICAL STATEMENT
Ethical guidelines for journal publication (based on Elsevier policies COPE's Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors)
Journal of Organizational and Management Indonesia (JOMI) serves as a primary platform for publishing various types of quantitative and qualitative research articles, as well as other scholarly works in the fields of organization and management, including: Organizational Behavior, Organizational Performance, Operational Management, Human Resource Management, Management Accounting, Management Control Systems, Management Information Systems, Strategic Management, Marketing Management, International Business, Business Ethics, Entrepreneurship, Financial Management, International Financial Management, and Banking Management.
Published by CV. Media Pena Mandiri, JOMI takes full responsibility for overseeing the publication process and upholds strict ethical standards throughout all stages of publication.
All editorial decisions made by JOMI are completely independent and free from influence by advertising, reprint revenues, or other commercial considerations. CV. Media Pena Mandiri and the Editorial Board are committed to maintaining open communication with other journals and publishers when necessary and beneficial. JOMI also actively supports the improvement of publication quality by organizing seminars, workshops, and training programs for journal contributors and editors.
RESPONSIBILITIES OF AUTHORS
1. Reporting Standards
Authors of original research articles must provide an honest and accurate description of their work, including a fair and objective discussion of its significance. The data presented should be precise and sufficiently detailed to allow replication. Any form of falsification or deliberately misleading statements constitutes unethical behavior and is unacceptable.
Opinion pieces must be clearly marked as such, and all submitted work should be accurate, transparent, and objective.
2. Data Access and Retention
Authors may be asked to provide raw data during the editorial review process and should be prepared to make the data publicly available when possible. Data should also be retained for a reasonable period after publication.
3. Originality and Plagiarism
Authors must ensure that submitted manuscripts are entirely original. Any use of others’ work or ideas must be properly cited. Plagiarism—including copying, paraphrasing significant parts of another work without attribution, or presenting others’ findings as one's own—is unethical and will not be tolerated.
4. Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication
Authors must not submit the same manuscript to more than one journal at the same time or republish previously published material. Simultaneous or redundant publication is unethical. In rare cases (e.g., translations or clinical guidelines), republication may be acceptable if there is transparency, proper citation of the original, and mutual consent from both journals.
5. Acknowledgment of Sources
Authors must acknowledge the work of others where relevant. All publications that significantly contributed to the reported research should be cited. Private communications or information obtained through peer review or grant review should not be used without explicit written permission.
6. Authorship
Authorship should be limited to individuals who have made substantial contributions to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the study. All contributors meeting these criteria should be listed as co-authors, while others should be acknowledged appropriately. The corresponding author is responsible for ensuring that all co-authors approve the final version of the manuscript and agree to its submission.
If the work involves any potentially hazardous chemicals, procedures, or equipment, these must be clearly disclosed in the manuscript.
7. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
Authors must disclose any financial or personal relationships that could influence their research or interpretation. Examples include employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patents, or grants. All sources of funding must also be disclosed.
8. Fundamental Errors in Published Works
When authors discover a significant error or inaccuracy in their published article, they are obligated to notify the journal editor promptly and cooperate in correcting or retracting the paper. If the editor is informed by a third party, the authors must respond appropriately.
RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE EDITORIAL BOARD
1. Publication Decisions
The editor-in-chief holds full responsibility for deciding which articles will be published. This decision must be based on the article’s scientific merit, originality, and relevance, while also complying with legal requirements regarding defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. Editors may consult with reviewers or editorial board members when making decisions.
2. Fairness
Editors must evaluate manuscripts solely based on intellectual content, without discrimination based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnicity, nationality, or political philosophy.
3. Confidentiality
Editors and editorial staff must maintain strict confidentiality concerning submitted manuscripts and only share information with those directly involved in the publication process (e.g., corresponding authors, reviewers, and the publisher).
4. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
Editors must not use unpublished materials from submitted manuscripts for their own research without the author's written consent. Editors should also recuse themselves from handling any manuscript in which they have a conflict of interest due to personal, academic, or financial relationships.
5. Investigation and Cooperation
Editors must take all allegations of ethical misconduct seriously. In collaboration with the publisher, they should investigate thoroughly and, if necessary, issue corrections, retractions, or statements of concern.
RESPONSIBILITIES OF REVIEWERS
1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer reviewers assist editors in making publication decisions and help authors improve their manuscripts. Peer review is a vital element of scholarly communication and ensures research integrity.
2. Timeliness
Reviewers who feel unqualified to review a submission or unable to meet the deadline should notify the editor immediately and withdraw from the review process.
3. Confidentiality
All manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential. They should not be shown or discussed with others unless approved by the editor.
4. Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted impartially and without personal bias. Reviewers must provide clear, constructive, and well-argued feedback.
5. Acknowledgment of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. If similarities or overlap with other publications are detected, the editor must be informed.
6. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
Reviewers must not use unpublished information from a manuscript for personal advantage. They should avoid reviewing manuscripts where conflicts of interest exist due to personal or professional relationships with the authors or affiliated institutions.
